Cuban vs Moroccan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cuban
Moroccan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Cubans
Moroccans
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
50.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
174th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
52.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Moroccan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 441,584,431 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234 and weighted average of 21.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,405,308 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 21.0%, a difference of 0.17%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cuban | Moroccan |
Minimum | 7.2% | 10.5% |
Maximum | 48.3% | 53.5% |
Range | 41.1% | 43.0% |
Mean | 20.6% | 24.5% |
Median | 20.6% | 20.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.0% | 18.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.0% | 31.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 13.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.3% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans and Moroccans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.13%), New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and Canadian (21.1%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |