Cuban vs Chinese Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cuban
Chinese
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Cubans
Chinese
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
246th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Chinese Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,858,548 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cubans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.064 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 47.3%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Cuban | Chinese |
| Minimum | 5.8% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 31.2% | 25.9% |
| Range | 25.5% | 22.5% |
| Mean | 15.8% | 10.8% |
| Median | 14.6% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.2% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.7% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 6.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 5.1% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Cubans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Spanish American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Ecuadorian (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Sudanese | 0.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nepalese | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (10.5%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Taiwan (10.5%, a difference of 1.4%), Immigrants from India (9.9%, a difference of 5.2%), Filipino (10.9%, a difference of 5.4%), and Immigrants from Ireland (11.0%, a difference of 5.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 11.4% |