Comanche vs Cherokee Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Comanche
Cherokee
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Comanche
Cherokee
20.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
282nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Comanche vs Cherokee Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,333,383 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049 and weighted average of 20.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 484,106,985 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.178 and weighted average of 19.7%, a difference of 1.9%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Comanche | Cherokee |
Minimum | 2.8% | 9.3% |
Maximum | 48.9% | 75.0% |
Range | 46.1% | 65.7% |
Mean | 23.0% | 27.7% |
Median | 21.5% | 25.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.0% | 19.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.8% | 32.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 13.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.5% | 12.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.2% | 12.3% |
Demographics Similar to Comanche and Cherokee by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Immigrants from Zaire (20.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Central American (20.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Jamaica (20.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Bangladeshi (20.0%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from West Indies (20.0%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Immigrants from Cabo Verde (19.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Spanish American Indian (19.6%, a difference of 0.44%), Chickasaw (19.8%, a difference of 0.50%), Vietnamese (19.6%, a difference of 0.55%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (19.6%, a difference of 0.57%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.6% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.7% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 19.8% |
Belizeans | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 19.9% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 19.9% |
Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.0% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 20.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 20.1% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 20.1% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 20.1% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 20.1% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 20.2% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 20.2% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 20.3% |