Colville vs Immigrants from Oceania Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Colville
Immigrants from Oceania
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Colville
Immigrants from Oceania
22.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
321st/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
68.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Colville vs Immigrants from Oceania Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,561,813 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Colville and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.102 and weighted average of 22.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,068,502 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 39.9%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Colville | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 8.3% | 4.3% |
Maximum | 92.7% | 39.0% |
Range | 84.4% | 34.8% |
Mean | 36.0% | 19.3% |
Median | 28.6% | 18.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.2% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 50.0% | 21.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 31.8% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.9% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.5% | 7.9% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Colville by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Colville are Yakama (22.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Cajun (22.6%, a difference of 0.21%), Paiute (22.6%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Congo (22.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and Immigrants from Honduras (22.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 22.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 22.6% |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 22.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 22.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 23.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are French Canadian (16.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Colombia (16.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Germany (16.1%, a difference of 0.14%), South American (16.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Uruguayan (16.2%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Fiji | 76.1 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Colombians | 76.1 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 75.3 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Slovaks | 75.2 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
French | 72.8 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 72.0 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
French Canadians | 68.7 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 68.4 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 67.8 /100 | #164 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Germany | 67.3 /100 | #165 | Good 16.1% |
South Americans | 67.2 /100 | #166 | Good 16.1% |
Uruguayans | 64.7 /100 | #167 | Good 16.2% |
Yugoslavians | 64.4 /100 | #168 | Good 16.2% |
Costa Ricans | 64.2 /100 | #169 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 64.2 /100 | #170 | Good 16.2% |