Chippewa vs Immigrants from Congo Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chippewa
Immigrants from Congo
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Chippewa
Immigrants from Congo
16.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
317th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Congo Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,995,312 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.544 and weighted average of 16.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,087,948 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Congo and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.023 and weighted average of 17.4%, a difference of 4.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Immigrants from Congo |
| Minimum | 7.0% | 0.94% |
| Maximum | 78.4% | 41.7% |
| Range | 71.4% | 40.8% |
| Mean | 25.6% | 18.6% |
| Median | 20.4% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.3% | 14.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.2% | 21.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.8% | 7.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.1% | 7.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.0% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa and Immigrants from Congo by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Guatemalan (16.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Bahamian (16.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Hispanic or Latino (16.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Choctaw (16.8%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from Central America (16.8%, a difference of 0.67%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Congo are Honduran (17.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Ute (17.5%, a difference of 0.32%), Cajun (17.5%, a difference of 0.34%), U.S. Virgin Islander (17.3%, a difference of 0.49%), and Dutch West Indian (17.1%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 16.6% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |