Chippewa vs Immigrants from Chile Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
COMPARE
Chippewa
Immigrants from Chile
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Comparison
Chippewa
Immigrants from Chile
18.0%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
320th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.1%
FEMALE POVERTY AMONG 25-34 YEAR OLDS
84.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
137th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Immigrants from Chile Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,001,722 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.510 and weighted average of 18.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,631,317 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Chile and poverty level among females between the ages 25 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.337 and weighted average of 13.1%, a difference of 38.0%.

Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chippewa | Immigrants from Chile |
| Minimum | 7.5% | 3.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 25.7% |
| Range | 92.5% | 22.6% |
| Mean | 33.8% | 14.0% |
| Median | 24.5% | 13.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.3% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 38.5% | 16.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.2% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.8% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 26.6% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Choctaw (18.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Menominee (18.0%, a difference of 0.26%), Ute (17.9%, a difference of 0.81%), Central American Indian (18.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Seminole (18.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 18.1% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 18.2% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 18.3% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 18.4% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 18.5% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 19.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Chile by Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds
In terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Chile are Brazilian (13.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Austrian (13.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from England (13.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Iraq (13.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and South African (13.0%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty Among 25-34 Year Olds |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 89.6 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 88.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.3 /100 | #132 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Serbians | 87.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Afghans | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 13.0% |
| South Africans | 85.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 85.5 /100 | #136 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 13.1% |
| Brazilians | 84.5 /100 | #138 | Excellent 13.1% |
| Austrians | 83.7 /100 | #139 | Excellent 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 83.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 13.1% |
| New Zealanders | 83.4 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.1% |
| Scandinavians | 82.3 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.1% |
| Israelis | 81.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.1% |
| Native Hawaiians | 78.9 /100 | #144 | Good 13.2% |