Chilean vs Icelander Male Poverty
COMPARE
Chilean
Icelander
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Chileans
Icelanders
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
83.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.0%
MALE POVERTY
68.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Icelander Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,512,426 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.232 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,599,836 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020 and weighted average of 11.0%, a difference of 2.2%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chilean | Icelander |
| Minimum | 0.80% | 0.64% |
| Maximum | 36.4% | 57.1% |
| Range | 35.6% | 56.5% |
| Mean | 10.5% | 12.2% |
| Median | 9.9% | 10.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.4% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.2% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 9.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Icelanders by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Peru (10.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Western Europe (10.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Belarus (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Vietnam (10.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Pakistani (10.8%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Armenian (11.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Syrian (10.9%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Germany (10.9%, a difference of 0.37%), Samoan (10.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and Afghan (10.9%, a difference of 0.41%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 77.5 /100 | #139 | Good 10.8% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 76.1 /100 | #140 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 75.8 /100 | #141 | Good 10.9% |
| Basques | 74.6 /100 | #142 | Good 10.9% |
| Afghans | 71.9 /100 | #143 | Good 10.9% |
| Samoans | 71.8 /100 | #144 | Good 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 71.6 /100 | #145 | Good 10.9% |
| Syrians | 71.4 /100 | #146 | Good 10.9% |
| Icelanders | 68.5 /100 | #147 | Good 11.0% |
| Armenians | 68.0 /100 | #148 | Good 11.0% |