Chickasaw vs Barbadian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Barbadian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Barbadians
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
274th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Barbadian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,263,328 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Barbadians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.053 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 0.51%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Barbadian |
Minimum | 1.9% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 38.6% | 31.5% |
Range | 36.7% | 29.8% |
Mean | 18.1% | 15.3% |
Median | 17.3% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.6% | 13.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.7% | 18.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 5.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Barbadians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Immigrants from Barbados (16.0%, a difference of 0.58%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Barbadians are Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Barbados (16.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Central American (16.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 16.1% |