Celtic vs Burmese Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Celtic
Burmese
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Celtics
Burmese
16.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
40.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
184th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.0%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs Burmese Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,451,982 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.133 and weighted average of 16.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,977,536 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.297 and weighted average of 13.0%, a difference of 28.1%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Celtic | Burmese |
Minimum | 2.2% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 53.6% | 41.5% |
Range | 51.4% | 40.3% |
Mean | 23.0% | 10.9% |
Median | 18.8% | 9.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.8% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.9% | 13.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.0% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.8% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.7% | 7.6% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Western Asia (16.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Kenyan (16.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Hmong (16.6%, a difference of 0.25%), Lebanese (16.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (16.7%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Ethiopians | 47.8 /100 | #177 | Average 16.5% |
Scotch-Irish | 47.5 /100 | #178 | Average 16.5% |
Hungarians | 47.3 /100 | #179 | Average 16.5% |
Hawaiians | 45.5 /100 | #180 | Average 16.5% |
South American Indians | 44.3 /100 | #181 | Average 16.5% |
Lebanese | 43.3 /100 | #182 | Average 16.6% |
Kenyans | 41.0 /100 | #183 | Average 16.6% |
Celtics | 40.6 /100 | #184 | Average 16.6% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 40.4 /100 | #185 | Average 16.6% |
Hmong | 38.4 /100 | #186 | Fair 16.6% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 37.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 16.7% |
Immigrants | South America | 37.7 /100 | #188 | Fair 16.7% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 34.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 16.7% |
Arabs | 31.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 16.8% |
Alaska Natives | 29.8 /100 | #191 | Fair 16.8% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Immigrants from Korea (13.0%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Ireland (13.1%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from Japan (13.1%, a difference of 1.3%), Maltese (13.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and Norwegian (13.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.3% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.3% |