Cape Verdean vs Sudanese Poverty
COMPARE
Cape Verdean
Sudanese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Cape Verdeans
Sudanese
14.4%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.0%
POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cape Verdean vs Sudanese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,560,730 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.142 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,120,634 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.528 and weighted average of 14.0%, a difference of 2.4%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cape Verdean | Sudanese |
Minimum | 2.9% | 0.75% |
Maximum | 32.5% | 40.5% |
Range | 29.6% | 39.8% |
Mean | 14.2% | 15.4% |
Median | 13.0% | 13.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 11.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 17.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.6% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Cape Verdeans and Sudanese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cape Verdeans are Cherokee (14.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (14.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Ottawa (14.3%, a difference of 0.35%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.36%), and Mexican American Indian (14.3%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Nepalese (14.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Ecuadorian (14.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Salvadoran (14.0%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Sudan (14.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and Potawatomi (14.1%, a difference of 0.61%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Salvadorans | 0.4 /100 | #241 | Tragic 14.0% |
Ecuadorians | 0.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 14.0% |
Sudanese | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 14.0% |
Nepalese | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 14.0% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 14.1% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 14.1% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #247 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 14.1% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 14.2% |
Cree | 0.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 14.2% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 14.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 14.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 14.3% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |