Burmese vs Palestinian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Burmese
Palestinian
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Burmese
Palestinians
10.1%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.0%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
97.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
72nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Burmese vs Palestinian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,767,896 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.124 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,096,591 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.004 and weighted average of 10.0%, a difference of 0.76%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Burmese | Palestinian |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 43.5% | 29.5% |
| Range | 41.8% | 28.4% |
| Mean | 10.5% | 9.1% |
| Median | 8.7% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 6.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.1% | 10.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.0% | 5.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.9% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese and Palestinians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Romanian (10.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (10.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Nepal (10.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Jordanian (10.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Poland (10.1%, a difference of 0.060%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Yugoslavian (10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Russian (10.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Turkish (10.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Samoan (10.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (10.0%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Australians | 98.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Samoans | 98.0 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Yugoslavians | 97.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Palestinians | 97.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Russians | 97.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Turks | 97.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 97.8 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| New Zealanders | 97.7 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 97.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 97.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 97.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Koreans | 97.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 97.3 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 97.3 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 97.2 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 97.2 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Romanians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Burmese | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 97.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.1% |