Bangladeshi vs Osage Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Bangladeshi
Osage
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Bangladeshis
Osage
24.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
287th/ 347
METRIC RANK
24.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
291st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bangladeshi vs Osage Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,594,140 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.097 and weighted average of 24.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,495,293 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.132 and weighted average of 24.4%, a difference of 1.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bangladeshi | Osage |
| Minimum | 6.9% | 10.2% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 50.0% |
| Range | 43.1% | 39.8% |
| Mean | 24.3% | 29.5% |
| Median | 22.9% | 30.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.5% | 23.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.3% | 35.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 12.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 9.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 9.6% |
Demographics Similar to Bangladeshis and Osage by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Spanish American (24.2%, a difference of 0.020%), U.S. Virgin Islander (24.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Cree (24.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Guatemala (24.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and Indonesian (24.3%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Alsatian (24.5%, a difference of 0.37%), American (24.5%, a difference of 0.44%), French American Indian (24.6%, a difference of 0.59%), Indonesian (24.3%, a difference of 0.60%), and U.S. Virgin Islander (24.2%, a difference of 0.94%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 24.4% |
| Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 24.5% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 24.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 24.6% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 24.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 24.8% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 24.9% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 25.0% |