Alaskan Athabascan vs Nigerian Family Poverty
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Nigerian
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Nigerians
10.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
2.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
231st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
2.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
235th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Nigerian Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,790,128 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 332,122,343 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Nigerians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.038 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 0.83%.

Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Nigerian |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 76.9% | 21.1% |
| Range | 74.9% | 19.2% |
| Mean | 18.8% | 10.0% |
| Median | 14.0% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 8.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.1% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.6% | 3.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.5% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.3% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Nigerians by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Immigrants from Panama (10.0%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (10.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Sudanese (10.0%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Sudan (10.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Armenia (10.0%, a difference of 0.62%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nigerians are Immigrants from Middle Africa (10.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Fijian (10.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Nigeria (10.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Sudan (10.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from Laos (10.2%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
| French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
| Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
| Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |