Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from China Single Female Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,584,348 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 23.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,922,860 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 18.1%, a difference of 30.1%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Alaskan Athabascan	Immigrants from China
Minimum	6.0%	7.4%
Maximum	100.0%	33.3%
Range	94.0%	25.9%
Mean	41.2%	16.3%
Median	33.3%	15.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	20.0%	13.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	51.6%	18.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	31.6%	4.9%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	28.9%	4.6%
Standard Deviation (Population)	28.7%	4.5%

Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty

Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Single Female Poverty

In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Nonimmigrants (23.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German (23.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from the Azores (23.5%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Zaire (23.8%, a difference of 1.0%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Single Female Poverty
Immigrants \| Senegal	0.1 /100 \| #272	Tragic 23.2%
Alaska Natives	0.1 /100 \| #273	Tragic 23.3%
Marshallese	0.1 /100 \| #274	Tragic 23.3%
Mexican American Indians	0.1 /100 \| #275	Tragic 23.4%
Immigrants \| Azores	0.0 /100 \| #276	Tragic 23.5%
Pennsylvania Germans	0.0 /100 \| #277	Tragic 23.6%
Immigrants \| Nonimmigrants	0.0 /100 \| #278	Tragic 23.6%
Alaskan Athabascans	0.0 /100 \| #279	Tragic 23.6%
Immigrants \| Latin America	0.0 /100 \| #280	Tragic 23.7%
Immigrants \| Zaire	0.0 /100 \| #281	Tragic 23.8%
Guatemalans	0.0 /100 \| #282	Tragic 23.8%
German Russians	0.0 /100 \| #283	Tragic 23.9%
Immigrants \| Dominica	0.0 /100 \| #284	Tragic 23.9%
Immigrants \| Guatemala	0.0 /100 \| #285	Tragic 24.1%
Cree	0.0 /100 \| #286	Tragic 24.1%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Single Female Poverty

In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (18.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Korea (18.1%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.68%), Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.74%), and Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.75%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Single Female Poverty
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	100.0 /100 \| #12	Exceptional 17.8%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	100.0 /100 \| #13	Exceptional 17.8%
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #14	Exceptional 17.9%
Indians (Asian)	100.0 /100 \| #15	Exceptional 17.9%
Iranians	100.0 /100 \| #16	Exceptional 18.0%
Immigrants \| Korea	100.0 /100 \| #17	Exceptional 18.1%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	100.0 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 18.1%
Immigrants \| China	100.0 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 18.1%
Immigrants \| Greece	100.0 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 18.3%
Maltese	100.0 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 18.3%
Burmese	100.0 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 18.3%
Asians	100.0 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 18.3%
Armenians	100.0 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 18.3%
Immigrants \| Singapore	100.0 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 18.3%
Immigrants \| Israel	100.0 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 18.3%