Alaskan Athabascan vs Central American Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Central American
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Central Americans
23.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
279th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Central American Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,584,348 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 23.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,457,156 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.245 and weighted average of 23.0%, a difference of 2.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Central American |
Minimum | 6.0% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 65.2% |
Range | 94.0% | 62.4% |
Mean | 41.2% | 25.2% |
Median | 33.3% | 23.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.0% | 21.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.6% | 27.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 31.6% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.9% | 10.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 28.7% | 10.6% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Central Americans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Nonimmigrants (23.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German (23.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from the Azores (23.5%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Zaire (23.8%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Laos (22.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Micronesia (23.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Scotch-Irish (22.9%, a difference of 0.24%), Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Fijian (23.1%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |