Slavic vs Filipino In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Slavic
Filipino
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Comparison
Slavs
Filipinos
85.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
93.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
84.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Filipino In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,808,387 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Slavs and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.106 and weighted average of 85.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,306,648 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.279 and weighted average of 84.9%, a difference of 0.14%.
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slavic | Filipino |
| Minimum | 37.3% | 70.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 62.7% | 29.4% |
| Mean | 85.9% | 84.8% |
| Median | 88.4% | 84.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 82.3% | 81.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 86.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.7% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.1% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.9% | 6.0% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs and Filipinos by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Egyptian (85.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Switzerland (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Japan (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zaire (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (85.0%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Immigrants from Belarus (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Finnish (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from South Africa (84.9%, a difference of 0.020%), South African (85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Chilean (85.0%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 93.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Egyptians | 93.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Slavs | 93.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 93.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 93.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 92.8 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 92.6 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 91.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 91.9 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| New Zealanders | 91.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 91.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Senegalese | 90.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Irish | 90.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 90.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| South Africans | 88.9 /100 | #115 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Chileans | 88.8 /100 | #116 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 88.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Finns | 87.8 /100 | #118 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Filipinos | 87.1 /100 | #119 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 86.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 84.9% |