Luxembourger vs Ethiopian In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Ethiopian
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Luxembourgers
Ethiopians
86.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Ethiopian In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,662,796 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.194 and weighted average of 86.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,141,148 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.066 and weighted average of 85.9%, a difference of 0.57%.
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Luxembourger | Ethiopian |
Minimum | 69.7% | 50.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 30.3% | 50.0% |
Mean | 89.9% | 85.5% |
Median | 89.1% | 86.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 86.4% | 85.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 94.3% | 89.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.9% | 3.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.7% | 8.2% |
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers and Ethiopians by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Sierra Leonean (86.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Bolivia (86.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (86.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Zimbabwean (86.1%, a difference of 0.35%), and Bolivian (86.1%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Immigrants from Ethiopia (85.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Cape Verdean (85.8%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Cameroon (85.8%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (86.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and Bolivian (86.1%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Sierra Leoneans | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 86.4% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 86.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 86.2% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 86.2% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 86.1% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 86.1% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 86.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 85.9% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 85.9% |
Cape Verdeans | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 85.8% |
Liberians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 85.7% |
Somalis | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 85.6% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 85.5% |