Lithuanian vs Immigrants from China In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Lithuanian
Immigrants from China
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Lithuanians
Immigrants from China
64.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
17.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
80.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
153rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from China In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,961,459 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.440 and weighted average of 64.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 457,121,912 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.715 and weighted average of 65.4%, a difference of 0.84%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lithuanian | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 33.3% | 28.6% |
Maximum | 76.6% | 85.0% |
Range | 43.3% | 56.4% |
Mean | 59.0% | 63.0% |
Median | 61.2% | 64.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 54.9% | 61.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 64.8% | 66.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.4% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 7.0% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age > 16
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Immigrants from Latin America (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Belizean (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Russian (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Slovene (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and Jamaican (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Mexican American Indians | 23.1 /100 | #199 | Fair 64.9% |
Armenians | 20.2 /100 | #200 | Fair 64.9% |
Ukrainians | 19.6 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.9% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 19.4 /100 | #202 | Poor 64.9% |
Russians | 18.8 /100 | #203 | Poor 64.9% |
Slovenes | 18.7 /100 | #204 | Poor 64.9% |
Jamaicans | 18.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 64.9% |
Lithuanians | 17.4 /100 | #206 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 16.4 /100 | #207 | Poor 64.8% |
Belizeans | 16.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 15.6 /100 | #209 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 14.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 64.8% |
Fijians | 14.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 64.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 64.8% |
Maltese | 13.8 /100 | #213 | Poor 64.8% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Yugoslavian (65.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants (65.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Czech (65.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (65.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Armenia (65.3%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Cypriots | 88.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 65.5% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 87.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 65.5% |
Bhutanese | 86.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 65.5% |
Immigrants | Albania | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 65.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 81.9 /100 | #150 | Excellent 65.4% |
Czechs | 81.5 /100 | #151 | Excellent 65.4% |
Yugoslavians | 81.3 /100 | #152 | Excellent 65.4% |
Immigrants | China | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 65.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 78.3 /100 | #154 | Good 65.4% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 65.3% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 75.9 /100 | #156 | Good 65.3% |
Immigrants | Russia | 75.7 /100 | #157 | Good 65.3% |
Panamanians | 75.2 /100 | #158 | Good 65.3% |
Immigrants | Syria | 74.6 /100 | #159 | Good 65.3% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 73.5 /100 | #160 | Good 65.3% |