Crow vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Crow
Chinese
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Crow
Chinese
75.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
346th/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
89.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,195,148 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Crow and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.424 and weighted average of 75.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,795 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.486 and weighted average of 85.0%, a difference of 12.0%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Crow | Chinese |
| Minimum | 32.4% | 64.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 67.6% | 35.9% |
| Mean | 69.1% | 87.3% |
| Median | 76.8% | 86.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 57.7% | 83.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 82.1% | 90.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.4% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.0% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.6% | 7.3% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Demographics Similar to Crow by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Yup'ik (76.4%, a difference of 0.68%), Yuman (77.1%, a difference of 1.5%), Lumbee (77.3%, a difference of 1.8%), Tohono O'odham (77.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and Navajo (73.8%, a difference of 2.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 75.9% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Israel (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), New Zealander (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Western Africa (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Spain (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Chile (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Australians | 92.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 91.5 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Austrians | 90.9 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Slavs | 90.7 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 90.6 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 90.2 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 90.0 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Chinese | 89.6 /100 | #131 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 89.5 /100 | #132 | Excellent 85.0% |
| New Zealanders | 89.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 89.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 88.9 /100 | #135 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Jordanians | 88.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 85.0% |
| South Africans | 88.0 /100 | #137 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Sri Lankans | 87.8 /100 | #138 | Excellent 85.0% |