Immigrants from Brazil vs Chickasaw Wage/Income Gap
COMPARE
Immigrants from Brazil
Chickasaw
Wage/Income Gap
Wage/Income Gap Comparison
Immigrants from Brazil
Chickasaw
27.0%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
5.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.2%
WAGE/INCOME GAP
3.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Brazil vs Chickasaw Wage/Income Gap Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 342,853,162 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.049 and weighted average of 27.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,661,645 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and wage/income gap percentage in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.319 and weighted average of 27.2%, a difference of 0.59%.
Wage/Income Gap Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Brazil | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.81% | 2.8% |
Maximum | 56.6% | 60.4% |
Range | 55.7% | 57.6% |
Mean | 28.0% | 29.3% |
Median | 27.4% | 28.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.5% | 22.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.7% | 36.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 14.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.9% | 12.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.9% | 12.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Brazil and Chickasaw by Wage/Income Gap
In terms of wage/income gap, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Immigrants from Pakistan (27.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Argentinean (27.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Hungary (27.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Bhutanese (27.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Romania (27.0%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from the Azores (27.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Spanish (27.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (27.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Nonimmigrants (27.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Creek (27.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Wage/Income Gap |
Immigrants | Turkey | 5.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Asia | 5.5 /100 | #229 | Tragic 27.0% |
Ottawa | 5.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 27.0% |
Bhutanese | 5.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 27.0% |
Argentineans | 5.2 /100 | #232 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 5.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 4.9 /100 | #234 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 4.8 /100 | #235 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Romania | 4.8 /100 | #236 | Tragic 27.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 4.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 27.1% |
Osage | 4.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 27.1% |
Estonians | 4.3 /100 | #239 | Tragic 27.1% |
Immigrants | Europe | 3.8 /100 | #240 | Tragic 27.1% |
Creek | 3.8 /100 | #241 | Tragic 27.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 3.7 /100 | #242 | Tragic 27.1% |
Spanish | 3.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 27.1% |
Chickasaw | 3.5 /100 | #244 | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 3.5 /100 | #245 | Tragic 27.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 27.2% |
Celtics | 2.8 /100 | #247 | Tragic 27.3% |
Cypriots | 2.8 /100 | #248 | Tragic 27.3% |