Chinese vs Immigrants from Turkey Median Family Income

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,799,903 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and median family income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.051 and weighted average of $116,188. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,914,261 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Turkey and median family income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037 and weighted average of $118,325, a difference of 1.8%.

Median Family Income Correlation Summary

Measurement	Chinese	Immigrants from Turkey
Minimum	$48,295	$87,281
Maximum	$176,564	$197,922
Range	$128,269	$110,641
Mean	$111,811	$130,330
Median	$112,252	$128,029
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	$98,862	$110,406
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	$127,363	$142,421
Interquartile Range (IQR)	$28,501	$32,015
Standard Deviation (Sample)	$27,086	$26,517
Standard Deviation (Population)	$26,847	$25,846

Demographics Similar to Chinese and Immigrants from Turkey by Median Family Income

In terms of median family income, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia ($116,165, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Africa ($116,286, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Malaysia ($115,880, a difference of 0.27%), Maltese ($115,862, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Norway ($115,847, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Turkey are Immigrants from Asia ($118,291, a difference of 0.030%), Australian ($118,440, a difference of 0.10%), Israeli ($118,577, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Lithuania ($118,053, a difference of 0.23%), and Estonian ($118,013, a difference of 0.26%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Median Family Income
Bhutanese	100.0 /100 \| #33	Exceptional $119,800
Bolivians	100.0 /100 \| #34	Exceptional $119,479
Soviet Union	100.0 /100 \| #35	Exceptional $119,262
Israelis	100.0 /100 \| #36	Exceptional $118,577
Australians	100.0 /100 \| #37	Exceptional $118,440
Immigrants \| Turkey	100.0 /100 \| #38	Exceptional $118,325
Immigrants \| Asia	100.0 /100 \| #39	Exceptional $118,291
Immigrants \| Lithuania	100.0 /100 \| #40	Exceptional $118,053
Estonians	100.0 /100 \| #41	Exceptional $118,013
Immigrants \| Bolivia	100.0 /100 \| #42	Exceptional $117,912
Bulgarians	100.0 /100 \| #43	Exceptional $117,818
Cambodians	100.0 /100 \| #44	Exceptional $117,780
Immigrants \| Greece	99.9 /100 \| #45	Exceptional $117,344
Immigrants \| Russia	99.9 /100 \| #46	Exceptional $116,942
Immigrants \| Austria	99.9 /100 \| #47	Exceptional $116,830
Immigrants \| South Africa	99.9 /100 \| #48	Exceptional $116,286
Chinese	99.9 /100 \| #49	Exceptional $116,188
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	99.9 /100 \| #50	Exceptional $116,165
Immigrants \| Malaysia	99.9 /100 \| #51	Exceptional $115,880
Maltese	99.9 /100 \| #52	Exceptional $115,862
Immigrants \| Norway	99.9 /100 \| #53	Exceptional $115,847