Sudanese vs Chinese Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Sudanese
Chinese
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Sudanese
Chinese
42.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
50.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Chinese Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,110,852 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.407 and weighted average of 42.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128 and weighted average of 50.4%, a difference of 19.7%.

Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sudanese | Chinese |
| Minimum | 10.0% | 35.3% |
| Maximum | 66.9% | 63.0% |
| Range | 56.9% | 27.8% |
| Mean | 41.4% | 50.6% |
| Median | 41.9% | 51.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 37.8% | 46.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 46.1% | 56.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 9.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 7.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Sudanese by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Honduran (42.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Eritrea (42.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Paiute (42.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Indonesian (42.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and Chippewa (42.1%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Sudanese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.1% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.0% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.0% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.0% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.0% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 41.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Pennsylvania German (50.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Pakistan (50.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (50.6%, a difference of 0.55%), Swiss (49.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Korea (49.9%, a difference of 0.98%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 51.9% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 51.8% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 51.6% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 51.1% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 51.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 50.6% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 50.4% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 50.4% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 50.1% |
| Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 49.9% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 49.9% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 49.8% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 49.7% |
| Swedes | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 49.7% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 49.6% |