Subsaharan African vs Crow Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Crow
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Crow
41.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
303rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
41.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Crow Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,572,233 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.143 and weighted average of 41.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,202,817 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Crow and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.186 and weighted average of 41.4%, a difference of 0.61%.

Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Subsaharan African | Crow |
| Minimum | 11.8% | 21.9% |
| Maximum | 72.3% | 80.8% |
| Range | 60.5% | 58.9% |
| Mean | 38.7% | 45.1% |
| Median | 38.6% | 43.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 34.1% | 37.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 43.4% | 53.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 16.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.6% | 13.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.5% | 12.9% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans and Crow by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Immigrants from Honduras (41.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Guyana (41.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Bahamas (41.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Sioux (41.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Belize (41.8%, a difference of 0.39%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Guyanese (41.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Western Africa (41.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (41.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Sioux (41.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and Haitian (41.2%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.0% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 41.9% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 41.8% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 41.8% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 41.8% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 41.8% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 41.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 41.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 41.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 41.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 41.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 41.4% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 41.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 41.4% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 41.2% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 41.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 41.0% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 40.9% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 40.9% |
| Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 40.9% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 40.9% |