Sioux vs Panamanian Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Sioux
Panamanian
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Sioux
Panamanians
28.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
98.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
93rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sioux vs Panamanian Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,087,425 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.341 and weighted average of 28.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,035,493 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.401 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 0.45%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sioux | Panamanian |
| Minimum | 8.8% | 4.6% |
| Maximum | 54.2% | 49.6% |
| Range | 45.4% | 45.0% |
| Mean | 29.0% | 24.4% |
| Median | 27.8% | 25.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.3% | 17.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 34.0% | 29.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.7% | 11.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 10.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Sioux and Panamanians by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Choctaw (28.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Palestinian (28.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South America (28.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (28.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Uganda (28.0%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Immigrants from Colombia (28.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Chickasaw (28.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (28.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (28.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ute (28.2%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
| Liberians | 99.6 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 28.3% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 28.3% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 99.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 99.4 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Chickasaw | 99.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Panamanians | 99.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 99.2 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.1 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Ute | 99.1 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 28.2% |
| Chileans | 98.9 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 98.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 98.8 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Indonesians | 98.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 98.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 98.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Palestinians | 98.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Sioux | 98.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Choctaw | 98.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Immigrants | South America | 98.0 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 97.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 28.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 97.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 28.0% |