Costa Rican vs Panamanian Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Costa Rican
Panamanian
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Costa Ricans
Panamanians
28.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
84th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
93rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Costa Rican vs Panamanian Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,384,155 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.247 and weighted average of 28.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,035,493 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.401 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 0.64%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Costa Rican | Panamanian |
Minimum | 7.1% | 4.6% |
Maximum | 54.8% | 49.6% |
Range | 47.7% | 45.0% |
Mean | 28.3% | 24.4% |
Median | 29.0% | 25.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.6% | 17.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.7% | 29.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 11.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 10.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.6% | 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Costa Ricans and Panamanians by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Nicaraguan (28.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Syria (28.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Kenyan (28.4%, a difference of 0.050%), South American (28.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Native/Alaskan (28.4%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Immigrants from Colombia (28.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Chickasaw (28.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (28.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Liberia (28.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and Ute (28.2%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Immigrants | Nepal | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Natives/Alaskans | 99.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 28.4% |
South Americans | 99.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Kenyans | 99.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Nicaraguans | 99.8 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Costa Ricans | 99.8 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants | Syria | 99.8 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 99.6 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Colombians | 99.6 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Liberians | 99.6 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 28.3% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 99.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 99.4 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Chickasaw | 99.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Panamanians | 99.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 99.2 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 99.1 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Ute | 99.1 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 28.2% |
Chileans | 98.9 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 28.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 98.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 28.1% |