Osage vs Uruguayan Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Osage
Uruguayan
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Osage
Uruguayans
32.1%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
37.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
188th/ 347
METRIC RANK
33.1%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
12.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Uruguayan Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,866,368 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.131 and weighted average of 32.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,023,012 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.247 and weighted average of 33.1%, a difference of 3.3%.

Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Osage | Uruguayan |
| Minimum | 4.0% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 96.0% | 96.6% |
| Mean | 41.9% | 41.9% |
| Median | 33.0% | 33.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.9% | 29.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.4% | 48.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.5% | 18.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.2% | 29.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.8% | 28.3% |
Demographics Similar to Osage and Uruguayans by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Immigrants from Kenya (32.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Czechoslovakian (32.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Tlingit-Haida (32.2%, a difference of 0.47%), Irish (32.2%, a difference of 0.49%), and Colombian (32.2%, a difference of 0.54%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are German Russian (33.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Africa (33.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Sudan (33.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Ute (33.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (32.9%, a difference of 0.69%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Czechoslovakians | 38.0 /100 | #187 | Fair 32.0% |
| Osage | 37.1 /100 | #188 | Fair 32.1% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 36.9 /100 | #189 | Fair 32.1% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 32.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 32.2% |
| Irish | 32.4 /100 | #191 | Fair 32.2% |
| Colombians | 31.9 /100 | #192 | Fair 32.2% |
| Fijians | 31.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 32.3% |
| Sudanese | 27.3 /100 | #194 | Fair 32.4% |
| Samoans | 21.9 /100 | #195 | Fair 32.6% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 21.7 /100 | #196 | Fair 32.6% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 32.7% |
| Costa Ricans | 20.3 /100 | #198 | Fair 32.7% |
| Immigrants | Thailand | 18.9 /100 | #199 | Poor 32.8% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 18.8 /100 | #200 | Poor 32.8% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 16.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 32.9% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 16.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 32.9% |
| Ute | 14.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 33.0% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 14.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 33.0% |
| German Russians | 13.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 33.1% |
| Uruguayans | 12.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 33.1% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 33.2% |