Iroquois vs Alaskan Athabascan Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Iroquois
Alaskan Athabascan
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Iroquois
Alaskan Athabascans
38.2%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
295th/ 347
METRIC RANK
37.7%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iroquois vs Alaskan Athabascan Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,233,897 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.438 and weighted average of 38.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,775,598 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.649 and weighted average of 37.7%, a difference of 1.3%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iroquois | Alaskan Athabascan |
| Minimum | 23.1% | 12.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 76.9% | 87.8% |
| Mean | 56.3% | 64.8% |
| Median | 53.8% | 63.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 40.8% | 36.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 68.4% | 100.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 27.6% | 63.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.1% | 32.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.7% | 32.1% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois and Alaskan Athabascans by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Alaska Native (38.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Dutch West Indian (38.4%, a difference of 0.52%), British West Indian (38.0%, a difference of 0.55%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (38.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and Jamaican (38.5%, a difference of 0.72%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Hispanic or Latino (37.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Liberia (37.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Creek (37.6%, a difference of 0.40%), Seminole (37.9%, a difference of 0.48%), and Blackfeet (37.9%, a difference of 0.52%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 37.4% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 37.4% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 37.4% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 37.5% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 37.5% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 37.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 37.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 37.7% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 37.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 37.9% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 37.9% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 38.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 38.0% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 38.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 38.3% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 38.4% |
| Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 38.5% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 38.6% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 38.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 38.6% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 38.7% |