Immigrants from South America vs Burmese Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from South America
Burmese
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from South America
Burmese
65.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
77th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South America vs Burmese Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 486,016,991 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South America and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 65.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,897,249 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 65.7%, a difference of 0.17%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from South America | Burmese |
| Minimum | 41.2% | 35.2% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 58.8% | 64.8% |
| Mean | 68.4% | 70.5% |
| Median | 67.1% | 70.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 64.0% | 63.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.9% | 79.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 15.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 12.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South America and Burmese by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South America are Yaqui (65.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from the Azores (65.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (65.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Puget Sound Salish (65.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Houma (65.7%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Laotian (65.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Houma (65.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (65.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from the Azores (65.6%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 99.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 99.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Americans | 99.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 99.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 65.4% |