Immigrants from Malaysia vs Zimbabwean Currently Married
COMPARE
Immigrants from Malaysia
Zimbabwean
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Immigrants from Malaysia
Zimbabweans
47.3%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
81.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
47.0%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
70.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Zimbabwean Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,973,854 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Malaysia and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.134 and weighted average of 47.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,204,681 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.241 and weighted average of 47.0%, a difference of 0.55%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Malaysia | Zimbabwean |
| Minimum | 26.6% | 28.2% |
| Maximum | 73.6% | 69.8% |
| Range | 47.0% | 41.6% |
| Mean | 47.7% | 50.2% |
| Median | 48.3% | 49.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 43.8% | 45.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.9% | 55.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.8% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Malaysia and Zimbabweans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Malaysia are Immigrants from Australia (47.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Afghan (47.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Icelander (47.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Norway (47.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Vietnam (47.2%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Turkey (47.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Cambodian (47.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Chilean (47.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Argentina (47.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and Carpatho Rusyn (47.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Afghans | 81.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 81.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 81.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 47.3% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.7 /100 | #135 | Good 47.2% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 78.2 /100 | #136 | Good 47.2% |
| Paraguayans | 77.8 /100 | #137 | Good 47.2% |
| Pakistanis | 77.5 /100 | #138 | Good 47.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 77.4 /100 | #139 | Good 47.2% |
| Cajuns | 75.3 /100 | #140 | Good 47.1% |
| Venezuelans | 74.4 /100 | #141 | Good 47.1% |
| Argentineans | 74.4 /100 | #142 | Good 47.1% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 74.2 /100 | #143 | Good 47.1% |
| Hmong | 73.4 /100 | #144 | Good 47.1% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 72.9 /100 | #145 | Good 47.1% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 72.6 /100 | #146 | Good 47.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 72.0 /100 | #147 | Good 47.0% |
| Cambodians | 70.4 /100 | #148 | Good 47.0% |
| Zimbabweans | 70.1 /100 | #149 | Good 47.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 70.0 /100 | #150 | Good 47.0% |
| Chileans | 69.8 /100 | #151 | Good 47.0% |