Immigrants from Japan vs Bhutanese Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Immigrants from Japan
Bhutanese
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Immigrants from Japan
Bhutanese
27.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
10.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
25.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Japan vs Bhutanese Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 339,902,345 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.309 and weighted average of 27.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,969,293 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.206 and weighted average of 27.3%, a difference of 0.57%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Japan | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 1.0% | 12.8% |
Maximum | 52.3% | 44.7% |
Range | 51.3% | 31.9% |
Mean | 26.2% | 26.4% |
Median | 26.8% | 27.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.0% | 22.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.7% | 29.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.7% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.7% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.6% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Japan and Bhutanese by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Japan are Greek (27.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Austrian (27.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Cuban (27.1%, a difference of 0.080%), U.S. Virgin Islander (27.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Northern European (27.2%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are American (27.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Kiowa (27.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Congo (27.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Sudan (27.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Haiti (27.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Immigrants | Congo | 28.7 /100 | #200 | Fair 27.3% |
Bhutanese | 25.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 27.3% |
Americans | 22.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 27.3% |
Kiowa | 22.2 /100 | #203 | Fair 27.3% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 21.6 /100 | #204 | Fair 27.3% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 20.3 /100 | #205 | Fair 27.2% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 20.2 /100 | #206 | Fair 27.2% |
Haitians | 19.8 /100 | #207 | Poor 27.2% |
Immigrants | Poland | 16.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 27.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 15.8 /100 | #209 | Poor 27.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 27.2% |
Welsh | 14.2 /100 | #211 | Poor 27.2% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 27.2% |
Okinawans | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 27.2% |
Africans | 13.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 27.2% |
Northern Europeans | 12.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 27.2% |
Cubans | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 27.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 12.1 /100 | #217 | Poor 27.1% |
Greeks | 11.4 /100 | #218 | Poor 27.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 10.7 /100 | #219 | Poor 27.1% |
Austrians | 9.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 27.1% |