Cuban vs Bhutanese Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Cuban
Bhutanese
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Cubans
Bhutanese
27.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
12.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
25.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
201st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cuban vs Bhutanese Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,752,721 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.123 and weighted average of 27.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 454,969,293 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.206 and weighted average of 27.3%, a difference of 0.49%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cuban | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 10.0% | 12.8% |
Maximum | 46.4% | 44.7% |
Range | 36.4% | 31.9% |
Mean | 27.1% | 26.4% |
Median | 26.5% | 27.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.8% | 22.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.1% | 29.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.0% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Cubans and Bhutanese by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are U.S. Virgin Islander (27.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Northern European (27.2%, a difference of 0.030%), African (27.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Greek (27.1%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Dominica (27.2%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are American (27.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Kiowa (27.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Congo (27.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Sudan (27.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Haiti (27.2%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Immigrants | Romania | 34.4 /100 | #198 | Fair 27.4% |
English | 32.0 /100 | #199 | Fair 27.3% |
Immigrants | Congo | 28.7 /100 | #200 | Fair 27.3% |
Bhutanese | 25.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 27.3% |
Americans | 22.8 /100 | #202 | Fair 27.3% |
Kiowa | 22.2 /100 | #203 | Fair 27.3% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 21.6 /100 | #204 | Fair 27.3% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 20.3 /100 | #205 | Fair 27.2% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 20.2 /100 | #206 | Fair 27.2% |
Haitians | 19.8 /100 | #207 | Poor 27.2% |
Immigrants | Poland | 16.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 27.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 15.8 /100 | #209 | Poor 27.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 14.4 /100 | #210 | Poor 27.2% |
Welsh | 14.2 /100 | #211 | Poor 27.2% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 27.2% |
Okinawans | 13.7 /100 | #213 | Poor 27.2% |
Africans | 13.0 /100 | #214 | Poor 27.2% |
Northern Europeans | 12.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 27.2% |
Cubans | 12.2 /100 | #216 | Poor 27.1% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 12.1 /100 | #217 | Poor 27.1% |
Greeks | 11.4 /100 | #218 | Poor 27.1% |