Immigrants from Argentina vs Choctaw Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Argentina
Choctaw
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from Argentina
Choctaw
64.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
92.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
124th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.9%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
93.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Argentina vs Choctaw Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 264,360,564 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.186 and weighted average of 64.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,627,638 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.395 and weighted average of 64.9%, a difference of 0.030%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Argentina | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 39.7% | 43.9% |
| Maximum | 96.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 57.2% | 56.1% |
| Mean | 64.9% | 66.7% |
| Median | 65.2% | 65.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 56.6% | 62.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.4% | 68.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.8% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.3% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.2% | 8.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Argentina and Choctaw by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Argentina are Immigrants from Belize (64.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Panamanian (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Hmong (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Panama (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and Italian (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Hmong (64.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Belize (64.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Hungarian (64.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Oceania (64.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and Panamanian (64.8%, a difference of 0.050%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Spanish | 96.2 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Argentineans | 95.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Ecuadorians | 95.4 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 95.4 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Cherokee | 95.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 65.0% |
| Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 94.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 94.2 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hungarians | 94.0 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Hmong | 93.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Choctaw | 93.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 92.8 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 92.7 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 64.9% |
| Panamanians | 92.4 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 92.0 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Italians | 91.9 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 91.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 90.2 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 90.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 64.8% |
| Cajuns | 89.4 /100 | #132 | Excellent 64.8% |
| Belizeans | 89.3 /100 | #133 | Excellent 64.8% |