Icelander vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Households with Children
COMPARE
Icelander
Alaskan Athabascan
Family Households with Children
Family Households with Children Comparison
Icelanders
Alaskan Athabascans
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
75.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
154th/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS WITH CHILDREN
67.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Icelander vs Alaskan Athabascan Family Households with Children Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,563,345 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.245 and weighted average of 27.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,814,006 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and percentage of family households with children in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.029 and weighted average of 27.6%, a difference of 0.22%.
Family Households with Children Correlation Summary
Measurement | Icelander | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 5.9% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 53.9% | 60.0% |
Range | 48.1% | 56.7% |
Mean | 25.4% | 25.9% |
Median | 26.7% | 25.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 20.4% | 17.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.1% | 31.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.7% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.5% | 11.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.4% | 11.7% |
Demographics Similar to Icelanders and Alaskan Athabascans by Family Households with Children
In terms of family households with children, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Immigrants from Cabo Verde (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Comanche (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Hungarian (27.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Ethiopian (27.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Portuguese (27.6%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Immigrants from Bangladesh (27.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Subsaharan African (27.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Czech (27.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (27.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and Romanian (27.6%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households with Children |
Immigrants | Moldova | 79.1 /100 | #147 | Good 27.6% |
Osage | 79.0 /100 | #148 | Good 27.6% |
Menominee | 78.9 /100 | #149 | Good 27.6% |
Argentineans | 78.5 /100 | #150 | Good 27.6% |
Portuguese | 77.8 /100 | #151 | Good 27.6% |
Ethiopians | 77.0 /100 | #152 | Good 27.6% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 75.6 /100 | #153 | Good 27.6% |
Icelanders | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 27.6% |
Comanche | 74.8 /100 | #155 | Good 27.6% |
Hungarians | 74.6 /100 | #156 | Good 27.6% |
Indians (Asian) | 71.6 /100 | #157 | Good 27.6% |
Romanians | 70.8 /100 | #158 | Good 27.6% |
Mongolians | 70.7 /100 | #159 | Good 27.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 67.5 /100 | #160 | Good 27.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 67.1 /100 | #161 | Good 27.6% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 67.0 /100 | #162 | Good 27.6% |
Czechs | 65.3 /100 | #163 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 64.9 /100 | #164 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 61.3 /100 | #165 | Good 27.5% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 61.2 /100 | #166 | Good 27.5% |
Dominicans | 61.1 /100 | #167 | Good 27.5% |