Crow vs Immigrants from Honduras Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Crow
Immigrants from Honduras
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Crow
Immigrants from Honduras
41.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
41.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
302nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow vs Immigrants from Honduras Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,202,817 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Crow and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.186 and weighted average of 41.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 322,465,433 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Honduras and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.117 and weighted average of 41.6%, a difference of 0.61%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Crow | Immigrants from Honduras |
Minimum | 21.9% | 21.2% |
Maximum | 80.8% | 80.6% |
Range | 58.9% | 59.5% |
Mean | 45.1% | 40.8% |
Median | 43.5% | 40.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 37.1% | 32.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.2% | 44.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.0% | 12.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.9% | 11.5% |
Demographics Similar to Crow and Immigrants from Honduras by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Guyanese (41.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Western Africa (41.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (41.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Sioux (41.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and Haitian (41.2%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Honduras are Subsaharan African (41.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Guyana (41.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Bahamas (41.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Sioux (41.5%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Belize (41.8%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.0% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 41.9% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 41.7% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 41.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 41.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 41.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 41.5% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 41.4% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 41.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 41.4% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 41.2% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 41.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 41.0% |
Africans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 40.9% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 40.9% |
Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 40.9% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 40.9% |