Central American Indian vs Osage Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Central American Indian
Osage
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Central American Indians
Osage
43.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
73.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Central American Indian vs Osage Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,060,937 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071 and weighted average of 43.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,797,548 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Osage and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.008 and weighted average of 46.9%, a difference of 7.1%.
![Central American Indian vs Osage Married-couple Households](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/married-couple-family-households/central-american-indians-vs-osage-married-couple-family-households-chart.webp)
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Central American Indian | Osage |
Minimum | 20.1% | 35.1% |
Maximum | 86.0% | 68.9% |
Range | 65.9% | 33.8% |
Mean | 45.4% | 51.3% |
Median | 44.1% | 49.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 39.0% | 45.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 50.2% | 58.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 12.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.5% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.4% | 8.2% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Central American Indians by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Iroquois (43.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Blackfeet (43.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Cameroon (43.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Ugandan (43.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Alaskan Athabascan (43.6%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
German Russians | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 44.0% |
Seminole | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 44.0% |
Central Americans | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 43.9% |
Apache | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 43.9% |
Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 43.9% |
Ugandans | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 43.8% |
Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 43.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 43.8% |
Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 43.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 43.7% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 43.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 43.6% |
Cree | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 43.5% |
Moroccans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 43.5% |
Demographics Similar to Osage by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Nonimmigrants (46.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Iraqi (46.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Oceania (46.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Delaware (46.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and Armenian (46.9%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Serbians | 76.3 /100 | #152 | Good 47.0% |
Hmong | 76.2 /100 | #153 | Good 47.0% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 76.1 /100 | #154 | Good 46.9% |
Arabs | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 46.9% |
Armenians | 75.4 /100 | #156 | Good 46.9% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.8 /100 | #157 | Good 46.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 73.3 /100 | #158 | Good 46.9% |
Osage | 73.2 /100 | #159 | Good 46.9% |
Iraqis | 71.7 /100 | #160 | Good 46.9% |
Delaware | 71.2 /100 | #161 | Good 46.8% |
Colombians | 71.0 /100 | #162 | Good 46.8% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 70.2 /100 | #163 | Good 46.8% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 70.0 /100 | #164 | Good 46.8% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 69.9 /100 | #165 | Good 46.8% |
Cherokee | 65.7 /100 | #166 | Good 46.7% |