Black/African American vs Chippewa Family Households
COMPARE
Black/African American
Chippewa
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Blacks/African Americans
Chippewa
61.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Black/African American vs Chippewa Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 565,332,954 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Blacks/African Americans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.527 and weighted average of 61.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,001,181 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.447 and weighted average of 62.1%, a difference of 1.0%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Black/African American | Chippewa |
Minimum | 49.9% | 25.0% |
Maximum | 69.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 19.8% | 75.0% |
Mean | 60.9% | 65.2% |
Median | 61.4% | 63.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 58.4% | 57.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 63.8% | 70.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 13.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 12.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to Blacks/African Americans and Chippewa by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Blacks/African Americans are Indonesian (61.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Switzerland (61.6%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from West Indies (61.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Tlingit-Haida (61.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Serbia (61.6%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Norway (62.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Subsaharan African (62.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Liberia (62.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Morocco (62.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Latvia (62.0%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Norway | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 62.1% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 62.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 62.1% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 62.0% |
Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 62.0% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 61.9% |
Moroccans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 61.9% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 61.9% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 61.8% |
Ugandans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 61.7% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 61.7% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 61.6% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 61.6% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.6% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 61.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 61.5% |