Ugandan vs Chickasaw 10th Grade
COMPARE
Ugandan
Chickasaw
10th Grade
10th Grade Comparison
Ugandans
Chickasaw
94.0%
10TH GRADE
80.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
94.1%
10TH GRADE
82.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
146th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Chickasaw 10th Grade Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,990,882 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with at least 10th grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.238 and weighted average of 94.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,726,831 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with at least 10th grade education in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.266 and weighted average of 94.1%, a difference of 0.030%.
10th Grade Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ugandan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 92.1% | 87.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 7.9% | 12.3% |
| Mean | 95.9% | 94.3% |
| Median | 95.8% | 94.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 94.6% | 92.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 97.6% | 95.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.1% | 3.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.0% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Chickasaw by 10th Grade
In terms of 10th grade, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Arab (94.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Ukraine (94.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Egyptian (94.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Kenyan (94.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Italy (94.0%, a difference of 0.040%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Nonimmigrants (94.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ukraine (94.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Arab (94.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Cherokee (94.1%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (94.1%, a difference of 0.040%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 10th Grade |
| Arapaho | 90.5 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 94.2% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 89.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 94.2% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 89.4 /100 | #139 | Excellent 94.2% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 87.6 /100 | #140 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Hmong | 86.6 /100 | #141 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Albanians | 86.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Cherokee | 84.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 84.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 83.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Chickasaw | 82.6 /100 | #146 | Excellent 94.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 81.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 94.0% |
| Arabs | 80.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 94.0% |
| Ugandans | 80.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 94.0% |
| Egyptians | 79.6 /100 | #150 | Good 94.0% |
| Kenyans | 79.1 /100 | #151 | Good 94.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 78.0 /100 | #152 | Good 94.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 94.0% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 75.3 /100 | #154 | Good 94.0% |
| Spanish | 74.9 /100 | #155 | Good 94.0% |
| Mongolians | 74.4 /100 | #156 | Good 94.0% |
| Kiowa | 73.3 /100 | #157 | Good 93.9% |