West Indian vs Japanese Vision Disability
COMPARE
West Indian
Japanese
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
West Indians
Japanese
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
West Indian vs Japanese Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,927,950 people shows no correlation between the proportion of West Indians and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.021 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,077,012 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.715 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 0.71%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | West Indian | Japanese |
Minimum | 1.1% | 0.43% |
Maximum | 5.0% | 14.1% |
Range | 3.9% | 13.7% |
Mean | 2.4% | 3.6% |
Median | 2.5% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 2.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 3.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.71% | 1.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.83% | 2.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.82% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to West Indians and Japanese by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to West Indians are British West Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.030%), White/Caucasian (2.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Haiti (2.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Belizean (2.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (2.4%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Immigrants from Micronesia (2.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Haitian (2.4%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Guatemala (2.4%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Laos (2.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and Bangladeshi (2.3%, a difference of 0.50%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Alsatians | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 2.3% |
French | 0.5 /100 | #246 | Tragic 2.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 2.3% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 2.3% |
Liberians | 0.5 /100 | #249 | Tragic 2.3% |
Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #250 | Tragic 2.3% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.4 /100 | #251 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 2.4% |
Japanese | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 2.4% |
Haitians | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 2.4% |
West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 2.4% |
British West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 2.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 2.4% |
Belizeans | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 2.4% |
Fijians | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 2.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 2.4% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 2.4% |