Ute vs South American Indian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Ute
South American Indian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Ute
South American Indians
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
86.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs South American Indian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,667,207 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,560,869 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 1.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | South American Indian |
Minimum | 1.7% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 26.5% | 15.9% |
Range | 24.8% | 14.2% |
Mean | 7.6% | 6.5% |
Median | 6.1% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.5% | 7.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and South American Indians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.9%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from Norway (5.9%, a difference of 0.53%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Immigrants from Africa (5.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Poland (5.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.29%), Russian (5.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and Norwegian (5.9%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | Poland | 95.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 5.9% |
South American Indians | 94.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 94.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Russians | 93.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Norwegians | 93.1 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Estonians | 92.9 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |