Tlingit-Haida vs Aleut Disability Age Over 75
COMPARE
Tlingit-Haida
Aleut
Disability Age Over 75
Disability Age Over 75 Comparison
Tlingit-Haida
Aleuts
50.6%
DISABILITY AGE OVER 75
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
50.6%
DISABILITY AGE OVER 75
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tlingit-Haida vs Aleut Disability Age Over 75 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,768,842 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.403 and weighted average of 50.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,756,409 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and percentage of population with a disability over the age of 75 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.366 and weighted average of 50.6%, a difference of 0.040%.
Disability Age Over 75 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tlingit-Haida | Aleut |
Minimum | 15.2% | 12.5% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 84.8% | 87.5% |
Mean | 60.9% | 60.3% |
Median | 62.5% | 50.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 48.4% | 42.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.5% | 78.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 23.0% | 35.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.9% | 27.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.7% | 26.8% |
Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida and Aleuts by Disability Age Over 75
In terms of disability age over 75, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Hispanic or Latino (50.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Fiji (50.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Cajun (50.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Central America (50.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Central American Indian (50.5%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Hispanic or Latino (50.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Fiji (50.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Central America (50.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Cajun (50.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Central American Indian (50.5%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age Over 75 |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 50.1% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 50.1% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 50.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 50.2% |
Japanese | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 50.2% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 50.3% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 50.5% |
Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 50.5% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 50.6% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 50.6% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 50.6% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 50.6% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 50.7% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 50.9% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 50.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 51.1% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 51.1% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 51.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 51.3% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 51.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 51.5% |