Thai vs Tsimshian Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Thai
Tsimshian
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Thais
Tsimshian
8.6%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Thai vs Tsimshian Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,261,452 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Thais and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.557 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,626,462 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.497 and weighted average of 16.7%, a difference of 95.0%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Thai | Tsimshian |
Minimum | 1.8% | 11.4% |
Maximum | 14.7% | 29.2% |
Range | 12.9% | 17.8% |
Mean | 6.4% | 19.4% |
Median | 6.1% | 15.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 12.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 27.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 15.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.3% | 7.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.3% | 6.8% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Thais by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Immigrants from Israel (8.6%, a difference of 0.42%), Immigrants from Iran (8.5%, a difference of 1.0%), Iranian (8.7%, a difference of 1.0%), Immigrants from China (8.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and Immigrants from Bolivia (8.7%, a difference of 1.7%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 8.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Tohono O'odham (16.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Creek (16.9%, a difference of 0.97%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 1.3%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and Pima (16.1%, a difference of 3.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |