Sierra Leonean vs Carpatho Rusyn Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Sierra Leonean
Carpatho Rusyn
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Sierra Leoneans
Carpatho Rusyns
10.8%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
89.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
25.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sierra Leonean vs Carpatho Rusyn Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,310,916 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sierra Leoneans and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,871,605 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.138 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 6.8%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sierra Leonean | Carpatho Rusyn |
Minimum | 4.4% | 3.6% |
Maximum | 20.0% | 38.7% |
Range | 15.6% | 35.0% |
Mean | 10.4% | 14.0% |
Median | 10.1% | 12.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.3% | 10.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.1% | 16.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.8% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 6.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Disability Age 35 to 64
Demographics Similar to Sierra Leoneans by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Sierra Leoneans are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (10.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Lithuanian (10.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Australian (10.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Scotland (10.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and Costa Rican (10.7%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Salvadorans | 91.9 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 91.7 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Costa Ricans | 91.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 91.3 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 10.7% |
Australians | 90.7 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 90.6 /100 | #142 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Sierra Leoneans | 89.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 10.8% |
Lithuanians | 88.7 /100 | #144 | Excellent 10.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 85.6 /100 | #145 | Excellent 10.9% |
South American Indians | 83.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 83.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 10.9% |
Arabs | 82.7 /100 | #148 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 81.1 /100 | #149 | Excellent 10.9% |
Syrians | 79.8 /100 | #150 | Good 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Iraqi (11.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Latin America (11.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.37%), Norwegian (11.5%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Iraq (11.6%, a difference of 0.48%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Northern Europeans | 34.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 11.4% |
Hungarians | 34.6 /100 | #189 | Fair 11.4% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 32.5 /100 | #190 | Fair 11.4% |
Swedes | 31.3 /100 | #191 | Fair 11.4% |
Norwegians | 29.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 11.5% |
Immigrants | Africa | 29.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 11.5% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 27.5 /100 | #194 | Fair 11.5% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 25.3 /100 | #195 | Fair 11.5% |
Iraqis | 24.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 11.5% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 21.0 /100 | #197 | Fair 11.6% |
Immigrants | Panama | 20.4 /100 | #198 | Fair 11.6% |
Basques | 19.5 /100 | #199 | Poor 11.6% |
Swiss | 18.7 /100 | #200 | Poor 11.6% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 11.6% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 17.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 11.6% |