Scandinavian vs Immigrants from the Azores Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Scandinavian
Immigrants from the Azores
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Scandinavians
Immigrants from the Azores
3.6%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
281st/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
297th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scandinavian vs Immigrants from the Azores Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,380,661 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.172 and weighted average of 3.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,255,123 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.513 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 3.0%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scandinavian | Immigrants from the Azores |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 0.28% |
| Maximum | 20.0% | 9.9% |
| Range | 18.4% | 9.6% |
| Mean | 6.9% | 4.0% |
| Median | 5.4% | 3.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.6% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 1.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 1.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 1.9% |
Demographics Similar to Scandinavians and Immigrants from the Azores by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are French American Indian (3.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Swedish (3.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Slovak (3.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Blackfeet (3.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Micronesia (3.6%, a difference of 0.81%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from the Azores are Pima (3.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Celtic (3.7%, a difference of 0.19%), Welsh (3.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Iroquois (3.7%, a difference of 0.46%), and German (3.7%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 3.6% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Scandinavians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Germans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 3.7% |