New Zealander vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vision Disability
COMPARE
New Zealander
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
New Zealanders
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
88.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
37.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
183rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,891,715 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.157 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 172,315,861 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of 2.2%, a difference of 4.1%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | New Zealander | Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar |
Minimum | 0.22% | 0.83% |
Maximum | 6.6% | 3.7% |
Range | 6.4% | 2.9% |
Mean | 2.2% | 2.1% |
Median | 1.9% | 2.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.3% | 1.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 0.47% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 0.62% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 0.62% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Immigrants from Hungary (2.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Cameroon (2.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Syrian (2.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Chile (2.1%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.1% |
Sudanese | 89.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 89.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 88.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 88.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.1% |
New Zealanders | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.1% |
Syrians | 87.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.1% |
Venezuelans | 87.2 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.1% |
Vietnamese | 86.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.1% |
Czechs | 86.3 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 86.3 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.1% |
Arabs | 86.3 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.1% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 85.2 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar are Moroccan (2.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Costa Rican (2.2%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Western Europe (2.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (2.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and Uruguayan (2.2%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Yugoslavians | 46.5 /100 | #176 | Average 2.2% |
Slavs | 46.0 /100 | #177 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 45.1 /100 | #178 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | North America | 44.5 /100 | #179 | Average 2.2% |
Uruguayans | 42.7 /100 | #180 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 41.1 /100 | #181 | Average 2.2% |
Costa Ricans | 40.7 /100 | #182 | Average 2.2% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 37.9 /100 | #183 | Fair 2.2% |
Moroccans | 35.4 /100 | #184 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 33.5 /100 | #185 | Fair 2.2% |
Native Hawaiians | 33.3 /100 | #186 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 30.3 /100 | #187 | Fair 2.2% |
Guyanese | 28.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 2.2% |
Salvadorans | 27.4 /100 | #189 | Fair 2.2% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 26.1 /100 | #190 | Fair 2.2% |