Moroccan vs Immigrants from Canada Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Moroccan
Immigrants from Canada
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Moroccans
Immigrants from Canada
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
52.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.1%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
50.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
174th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Moroccan vs Immigrants from Canada Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,789,132 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 6.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 459,245,879 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.680 and weighted average of 6.1%, a difference of 0.14%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Moroccan | Immigrants from Canada |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 0.55% |
| Maximum | 15.0% | 64.0% |
| Range | 12.5% | 63.4% |
| Mean | 6.9% | 12.2% |
| Median | 6.2% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.3% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.9% | 11.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Moroccans and Immigrants from Canada by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (6.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Ecuador (6.1%, a difference of 0.070%), Croatian (6.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (6.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and Vietnamese (6.1%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Canada are Croatian (6.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (6.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Vietnamese (6.1%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Ecuador (6.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from North America (6.1%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Nigerians | 67.1 /100 | #162 | Good 6.1% |
| Lebanese | 66.2 /100 | #163 | Good 6.1% |
| Basques | 63.7 /100 | #164 | Good 6.1% |
| Nicaraguans | 63.2 /100 | #165 | Good 6.1% |
| Iraqis | 62.8 /100 | #166 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 60.7 /100 | #167 | Good 6.1% |
| Ecuadorians | 60.5 /100 | #168 | Good 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 58.1 /100 | #169 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 53.8 /100 | #170 | Average 6.1% |
| Moroccans | 52.6 /100 | #171 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 52.2 /100 | #172 | Average 6.1% |
| Croatians | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 6.1% |
| Vietnamese | 47.2 /100 | #175 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | North America | 45.6 /100 | #176 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | England | 45.4 /100 | #177 | Average 6.1% |
| Scandinavians | 44.5 /100 | #178 | Average 6.1% |
| Austrians | 44.1 /100 | #179 | Average 6.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 43.9 /100 | #180 | Average 6.1% |
| Swiss | 43.1 /100 | #181 | Average 6.1% |
| Serbians | 42.8 /100 | #182 | Average 6.1% |