Macedonian vs Immigrants from Latvia Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Macedonian
Immigrants from Latvia
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Macedonians
Immigrants from Latvia
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
82.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
144th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
71.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
159th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Macedonian vs Immigrants from Latvia Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,658,712 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Macedonians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,736,193 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.678 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 0.91%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Macedonian | Immigrants from Latvia |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 0.16% |
| Maximum | 10.7% | 28.4% |
| Range | 9.1% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 5.9% | 7.4% |
| Median | 5.9% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.0% | 4.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.7% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.7% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.8% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.8% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Macedonians and Immigrants from Latvia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Macedonians are Romanian (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Philippines (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Swedish (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Pakistani (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Greece (6.0%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Fiji (6.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Ghanaian (6.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Northern European (6.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Scotland (6.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and Central American (6.0%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 83.0 /100 | #142 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Romanians | 82.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Macedonians | 82.8 /100 | #144 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Pakistanis | 82.5 /100 | #145 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 82.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 82.4 /100 | #147 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 82.0 /100 | #148 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Lithuanians | 81.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Maltese | 81.6 /100 | #150 | Excellent 6.0% |
| Greeks | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 78.8 /100 | #152 | Good 6.0% |
| Syrians | 75.5 /100 | #153 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 75.1 /100 | #154 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 72.1 /100 | #155 | Good 6.0% |
| Northern Europeans | 71.8 /100 | #156 | Good 6.0% |
| Ghanaians | 71.3 /100 | #157 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 71.2 /100 | #158 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 71.1 /100 | #159 | Good 6.0% |
| Central Americans | 69.8 /100 | #160 | Good 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 69.2 /100 | #161 | Good 6.1% |