Lumbee vs Colville Vision Disability
COMPARE
Lumbee
Colville
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Lumbee
Colville
3.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.0%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Colville Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,245,889 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.007 and weighted average of 3.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,683,927 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Colville and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.097 and weighted average of 3.0%, a difference of 11.8%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lumbee | Colville |
Minimum | 0.90% | 0.59% |
Maximum | 7.2% | 8.5% |
Range | 6.3% | 7.9% |
Mean | 4.1% | 3.6% |
Median | 4.1% | 3.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.4% | 2.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.4% | 5.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 1.8% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee and Colville by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Pueblo (3.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Pima (3.3%, a difference of 1.6%), Houma (3.4%, a difference of 1.7%), Choctaw (3.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and Kiowa (3.3%, a difference of 4.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Colville are Central American Indian (3.0%, a difference of 0.64%), Seminole (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%), Cajun (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%), Apache (3.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and Yuman (3.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 3.0% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 3.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 3.0% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 3.0% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 3.4% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 3.9% |