Latvian vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Latvian
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Latvians
Chickasaw
3.2%
HEARING DISABILITY
5.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
225th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Latvian vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,695,390 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.748 and weighted average of 3.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 39.9%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Latvian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.95% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 17.1% | 21.2% |
Range | 16.2% | 18.8% |
Mean | 5.2% | 7.4% |
Median | 4.1% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 8.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.8% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.2% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.2% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Latvians by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Icelander (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Lebanese (3.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Mexican (3.2%, a difference of 0.21%), Bhutanese (3.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Portugal (3.2%, a difference of 0.42%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 7.0 /100 | #218 | Tragic 3.2% |
New Zealanders | 6.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 3.2% |
Malaysians | 6.6 /100 | #220 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 6.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 6.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 3.2% |
Mexicans | 5.6 /100 | #223 | Tragic 3.2% |
Icelanders | 5.2 /100 | #224 | Tragic 3.2% |
Latvians | 5.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 3.2% |
Lebanese | 5.0 /100 | #226 | Tragic 3.2% |
Bhutanese | 4.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 3.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 4.3 /100 | #228 | Tragic 3.2% |
Maltese | 4.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 3.2% |
Greeks | 3.2 /100 | #230 | Tragic 3.2% |
Luxembourgers | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 3.2% |
Ukrainians | 2.9 /100 | #232 | Tragic 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |