Immigrants from Somalia vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Somalia
Chickasaw
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Somalia
Chickasaw
2.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
95.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
96th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.5%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Somalia vs Chickasaw Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,097,804 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Somalia and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.099 and weighted average of 2.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,680,195 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.383 and weighted average of 4.5%, a difference of 61.1%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Somalia | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.87% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 5.0% | 21.2% |
Range | 4.1% | 18.8% |
Mean | 2.8% | 7.4% |
Median | 2.8% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.5% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.2% | 8.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.69% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.75% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.75% | 3.8% |
Similar Demographics by Hearing Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Somalia by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Somalia are Immigrants from Afghanistan (2.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Israeli (2.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Uruguayan (2.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Honduras (2.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (2.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Belizeans | 96.6 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 96.6 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 96.5 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Iranians | 96.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 96.3 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Uruguayans | 95.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Israelis | 95.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 95.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 95.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Spain | 94.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Taiwanese | 94.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Alaska Native (4.5%, a difference of 0.21%), Choctaw (4.5%, a difference of 1.6%), Creek (4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), Pueblo (4.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and Kiowa (4.3%, a difference of 3.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 4.2% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 4.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 4.2% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 4.3% |
Aleuts | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 4.3% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 4.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 4.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 4.5% |
Alaska Natives | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 4.5% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 4.5% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 4.6% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 4.6% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 4.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 4.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 4.8% |