Immigrants vs Immigrants from Norway Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants
Immigrants from Norway
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants
Immigrants from Norway
6.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
86.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.9%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
90.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants vs Immigrants from Norway Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 577,108,062 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.034 and weighted average of 6.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,699,496 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.793 and weighted average of 5.9%, a difference of 0.49%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants | Immigrants from Norway |
Minimum | 1.6% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 20.4% | 33.0% |
Range | 18.8% | 30.7% |
Mean | 6.1% | 8.2% |
Median | 5.8% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.4% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.2% | 8.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.89% | 3.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants and Immigrants from Norway by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Ute (6.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Europe (6.0%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Italy (6.0%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (6.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Syria (6.0%, a difference of 0.31%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Immigrants from Western Asia (5.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (5.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Arab (5.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Costa Ricans | 92.6 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Icelanders | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Russia | 92.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 92.2 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Koreans | 91.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Arabs | 91.5 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 90.9 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 90.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Norway | 90.5 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 5.9% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 89.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 89.5 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 87.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 86.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 6.0% |
Ute | 86.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 85.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 84.1 /100 | #136 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Syria | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 83.9 /100 | #138 | Excellent 6.0% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 83.6 /100 | #139 | Excellent 6.0% |
Czechs | 83.3 /100 | #140 | Excellent 6.0% |
Swedes | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 6.0% |